02
How we handle evidence
We separate published horticultural guidance, technical data and contributor records. We do not present one type as another.
- Source research: RHS, government, university, charity and recognised horticultural material where relevant.
- Technical information: dimensions, timings and specifications checked against suitable primary or authoritative sources.
- Contributor field records: observations supplied to the editorial team and labelled as such.
- Named review: shown only after that person has checked the individual page.
Some older articles contain field records supplied under an earlier byline. We are reviewing those records.
They are not reassigned to Matt W or described as his personal trials.
03
UK-first guidance
Advice is written for British seasons, terminology and units. We identify regional variation, frost risk and safety issues where relevant.
We do not simply relabel advice written for another climate.
04
Fact-checking and freshness
We check factual claims and links before substantial updates. Articles are revised when guidance, legislation or pest threats change.
Product information is also reviewed when relevant. A modified date appears after a meaningful editorial update.
05
Monetisation and integrity
Paid directory listings, sponsored material, affiliate links and advertising are labelled where they appear.
These commercial arrangements remain separate from editorial decisions. Payment does not buy a favourable recommendation inside an independent guide.
06
Corrections
Email editor@gardenuk.co.uk with the page address and supporting information.
We investigate credible reports and correct confirmed errors. Material changes receive an updated date.
We identify who produced the content, what supports it and where our expertise has limits.
Meet the Garden UK Editorial Team and read about Matt W.